Define the role of government in public policy Research Paper

Define the spot of government in public polity - Research Paper Exampleich it can never be for the rice beer of any individual, or humble number of individuals, to erect and maintain because profit could never repay the expense to any individual or small number of individuals, though it may frequently do much more than repay it to a great society.Adam Smiths statement can be interpreted to mean that the role of government is in the area of defense, administration of justice, public works, and in building and maintaining institutions in the public interest. It is delicate to interpret the first three governments role is in defense, justice, and in public works. However, the twenty-five percent can have several interpretations. In any case, much of economics has maintained that market is faraway more efficient than government in allocating private goods and services---provided that the goods or services have no externalities or additional benefits or harm (Rosen, 1995, pp. 61-89 ). Supposedly, there are also public goods which can be in the best interest of the public that government provides. However, much of economics has said that although government has a right in making public goods or services available, the government can mobilize the private firmament to produce the goods or services. Thus, this is the rationale for privatization and public-private partnerships to make available certain goods and services that would be in the interest of the public to make available.On the other hand, Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, Bentham Mill, and Jean Jacques Rosseau emphasized a favorable contract between rulers and the ruled (Gaus & Kukathas, 2004, p. 23-24). However, given the possible variations of feasible interpretations that can be made on the statement of Adam Smith and given the range of needs that the ruled can demand on rulers on what constitute their obligations as rulers, the role of government in public policy can be anything that the public has succ essfully asserted politically. Of course, economists can talk of efficiency but as was